A voice AI agent for inbound and outbound calls: available 24/7, follows business workflows, performs actions in connec…
A practical guide to CRM–ERP integration: data to synchronise, sources of truth, APIs and webhooks, duplicate protectio…
Automation is not “a bot instead of a person”. It is a request that does not get lost between tabs, an owner who hears about it at once, and a customer who gets an answer even when everyone is busy.
Discuss a projectSix steps a person usually does by hand — and at each one a share of requests goes missing.
We follow a request as it works today: who sees it, who answers, where it waits and why it gets lost.
Instagram, WhatsApp, Viber, email, site forms and calls land in one shared queue.
Who gets a request: by area, language, workload, working hours and customer priority.
Confirmations, answers to common questions and follow-ups — with a clear handover to a person.
Appointment reminders, review requests after a purchase, nudges for abandoned baskets or invoices.
A request becomes a deal or a task, and the outcome returns to the customer record.
If an outside system fails to answer, the scenario does not break: it retries and alerts the owner.
How many enquiries, from which channels, how many closed automatically and where a scenario stalls.
| A button-based chatbot | An off-the-shelf messaging tool | A process by VMTech | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enquiry channels | One messenger | Email and SMS | Every channel in one queue |
| Knowledge of the customer | None | Just an address and a name | History, purchases, account owner |
| Complex enquiries | A dead end in the menu | Not covered | Handed to a person with context |
| Changing the logic | Within the builder's limits | Through the vendor's support | Around your process, without limits |
| What stays with you | Conversations inside the bot | Contact lists | The database, the scenarios and the access |
Messenger accounts, numbers and third-party subscriptions stay yours. VMTech designs the scenarios, builds the connections, wires them up and maintains them.
With a look at what already happens. We follow one request from the first message to closure and mark where it waits for a person, where data is retyped and where it disappears. Automating a mess is pointless — the process has to be described first, and that step alone often shows half the problems are solved by rules rather than software.
We do not pass automated replies off as a live employee. A booking confirmation, an order status or a reminder is a service the customer expects, and it reads as normal when it arrives fast and to the point. Anything outside the scenario goes to a person along with the conversation history, so the customer never repeats themselves.
No. You can start with a simple queue of requests with history and owners — enough to stop losing enquiries. If a CRM arrives later, the scenarios connect to it: they write outcomes wherever you point them and are not tied to one system.
The scenario does not fail silently. The step goes into a queue and retries, and if the retry also fails the owner gets a notification with the error text and a link to the request. The request stays in the queue with a status rather than vanishing.
The first scenario — usually the most painful process — goes live within a few weeks so the effect is visible at once. The rest follow one at a time: easier to verify each one works, and no big-bang launch that stops the business.
Usually the opposite happens: the dullest part is taken off people — retyping data, digging for history, sending identical messages. The work that needs a human — the conversation, the disputed case, the sale — stays with people, and there is more time for it.
